(1) Title, Authors, and Affiliation . Describes report contents succinctly, who did the work (you), and where work performed (Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Missouri-St. Louis).
(2) Abstract . Briefly describes what experiment you did and briefly summarizes data and conclusions. A well-written abstract summarizes your report in a ~5-20 short choppy statements.
(3) Introduction [a.k.a. what others have previously reported; ~1.5-2 pages]. This is not a summary of the laboratory manual introduction. Literature citations (not Websites) in proper format should also be present. Key points of the experiment appear here and often dictate differences A, B, and C grades. This often can be prepared in advance of the laboratory experiment.
(4) Motivation [a.k.a. why other than a grade are you writing this document or why should we care?)]. This is again not a summary of the laboratory manual introduction (~1-2 paragraphs). Include as a portion of the Introduction section. Literature citations (not websites) in proper format should also be present.
(5) Experimental/Physical Methods . This described what purification techniques for reagents, sources, prior literature synthetic details, and instrumentation (model number and any modifications) was used to prepare/characterize your reaction products. (~1-3 paragraphs, abstract style). Literature citations (not websites) in proper format should also be present.
(6) Experimental. Describes the reagent quantities, times, temperatures, and pressures (etc.) used during experiment. Should be accurate and complete so that the experiment may be repeated by another. Yields and additional analysis data must also be present in short format. Use neutral past tense (i.e. no I or we).
(7) Results and Discussion . This section compares your research findings to the primary research literature (i.e. not website or those in lab manual). You should describe what was done, interpret and report your data, and compare your data/conclusions to the primary literature (e.g. published manuscript). Literature citations (not websites) in proper format should also support your claims. (~2-20 pages; judgment call). The length of this section depends on the experimental data and complexity of experiment.
(8) Figures, Tables, and Schemes . These should include experimental data plots (spectra, structures, etc.) or clearly indicate non-trivial chemical transformations in a graphical format. Acid-base neutralization, salt elimination, distillation apparatus, Schlenk line design, etc. are not useful. For examples consult several manuscripts that appear in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
(9) Conclusions . You should briefly describe why you performed the experiment, what conclusions were drawn, how they agree with or differ from literature reports, and propose a new avenue for study (a.k.a. future directions). This section will be ~ 1-2 paragraphs in length and is not the same as an abstract.
(10) Acknowledgments . You should thank staff, faculty, and students who assisted with data collection, analysis, or experimental issues. Access to facilities outside of the laboratory and their funding sources should also be mentioned.
(11) References. Primary literature citations (minimum = 20) that are used to support claims and assignments contained within the written report. Websites are not allowable sources for citations or information. The references must contain 75% original citations (i.e. other than those described in the laboratory handout or manual). The presence of online citations will result in a grade of zero and the report will be returned. Note: Must use J. Am. Chem. Soc. format. See: http://pubs.acs.org/journal/jacsat
(12) Supporting Information . Includes trivial calculations, Figures, and any additional data that does not appear in the manuscript text.