When I use a word it means exactly what I want it to mean, nothing more and nothing less.
Humpty Dumpty
from Alice in Wonderland
Let . Define a set to be open in if:
and is open in .
For example, any and any .
, and is open in .
For example, any and any . And
, and is open in .
For example, any and any . And
Show that this forms a topology:
is open since and is open in
is open in since it is open in
That the given subsets are closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections follows by some simple Boolean algebra . Check that each of the three types of open sets are closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections. Then check that a union or intersection of one set of type 1. 2. or 3. with another set of type 1. 2. or 3. gives a set of type 1. 2. or 3.
is not Hausdorff. In particular, there do not exist open sets and such that , and
Assume then is an open set of hence for some .
Assume then for some
But,
Let be a topological space and let . We can define a topology on which we write as be defining a set to be open in if either or is open in and . We call this the local topology at .
One checks that this does define a topology and if has at least two points then it is not Hausdorff. All non-empty open sets contain .
Let be any set. Define and all finite subsets to be closed. It is immediate that arbitrary intersections and finite unions of closed sets are closed hence the complements, the cofinite sets, and form a topology. If is infinite this is not Hausdorff. We want to look at the cofinite topology on
Suppose we are given such that then is continuous.
. More generally, the inverse image of finite (closed) sets are finite (closed).
Let Let be a sequence,
Then if and only if is continuous, having the cofinite topology.
This is almost a trivial restatement of the various definitions.
By definition, if for any there exists an such that
That is, the inverse image of any open set in is cofinite.
Conversely, suppose the inverse image of any open set in is cofinite in Since is open its inverse image is cofinite that is there exists an such that
Let be a subsequence of a convergent sequence then
Let be the functional representation of . From the Theorem, implies is continuous.
Letting generate the subsequence , for all implies that
Hence is continuous as is , being the composition of continuous functions. Thus, again from the Theorem,