As a Center for Outsourcing, India Could Be Losing Its Edge
By NOAM SCHEIBER
N early April, Infosys Technologies,
an Indian outsourcing firm, had a party to celebrate reaching $1
billion in annual revenue. It gathered nearly 10,000 employees under a
tent on its Bangalore campus and plied them with food and
entertainment. The company also distributed some $23 million in
bonuses. "And we're doing a lot of other things to retain employees,"
said Stephen R. Pratt, chief executive of the Infosys consulting arm in
the United States. | Advertisement
| |
Infosys
is hardly the only Indian company making a serious effort to attract
and keep employees. Over all, according to a recent survey by Hewitt Associates, the consulting group, wages in the country's major outsourcing sectors have been rising by close to 15 percent a year. The
reason is increased competition for labor, thanks in large part to
American companies' rush to outsource work offshore. In fact, the
competition has become so fierce that typical Indian operations in
business processing - including call centers and offices handling
payroll, accounting and human-resources functions - can expect to lose
15 to 20 percent of their work forces each year, versus single-digit
percentage losses in the late 1990's. The surge in offshore
outsourcing has attracted the attention of American politicians worried
about the loss of jobs at home. In late April, the presidential
campaign of Senator
John Kerry announced its "Jobs First" tour and said, "While the
president and his economic advisers have insisted that outsourcing
benefits America, a record number of U.S. workers have lost their jobs
to countries overseas." But the data from India show
that, to some extent, the offshore outsourcing phenomenon may be
self-correcting. Though outsourcing shows no sign of fading, rising
wages and rapid turnover in Indian hubs may reduce the savings American
companies reap when they send work abroad. The stiffest
competition for offshore labor tends to occur in India's so-called
first-tier cities: Bangalore, Mumbai, New Delhi and Hyderabad. In some
sectors of the outsourcing market, attrition rates are 50 to 75 percent
a year, according to Sunil Mehta, vice president of the National
Association of Software and Service Companies, or Nasscom, an industry
trade group in India. Managers in the business-processing
sector, in particular, have difficulties keeping workers. A typical
outsourcing contract sends workers from an Indian company "onshore" -
to the American company's headquarters - while the outsourcing project
is starting. The problem is that the onshore experience becomes a
valuable credential in the American or Indian labor markets. "Many
don't want to go back offshore," said William S. McCarter, chief
operating officer and executive vice president of ePolicy Solutions, a
company based in Torrance, Calif., that focuses on Web-based technology
services. "Or if they do go back offshore, they have a marketable skill
to churn in the Indian market." The situation became so dire
last spring that, according to a report in India in The Business
Standard, the top outsourcing firms in business processing reached an
informal agreement not to poach employees from one another. Other
retention measures included clauses in employment contracts to require
each new worker to observe a three-month cooling-off period after the
hiring date before accepting another job offer. Not surprisingly, wage increases have been the most common method of attracting and retaining employees. For example, Wipro,
the big outsourcing company, gave its 24,000 employees in India an
average raise of 10 percent last October; the increases were as high as
15 percent for managers. These costs have largely come out of its
bottom line - denting its operating margin by 1 percentage point to 1.5
percentage points a quarter - rather than showing up as higher prices.
(The leading Indian outsourcing companies have operating margins of 20
percent to 25 percent.) But part of Wipro's higher costs have
been passed along. "Certain customers got a price increase" last
quarter, said Sridhar Ramasubbu, a company spokesman. Indian
executives like Jaithirth Rao, the chief executive of the MphasiS, an
outsourcing company, and the current chairman of Nasscom, argue that
the labor shortage, especially for middle managers, will be temporary.
Local universities have already begun expanding the enrollment in two-
and four-year business programs, according to outsourcing company
executives. There are, to be sure, pockets of the country where
less-skilled technical workers have difficulty finding jobs. But there
are reasons to believe that India's shortage of highly skilled labor
could be stubborn. A recent Nasscom report projected that if India
continued to produce college graduates at the current rate, demand
would exceed supply by 20 percent in the main outsourcing markets by
2008. "Candidly, we see a labor problem in India right now," said Dan Zadorozny, the vice president for applications delivery at Electronic Data Systems, the big seller of computer services that is based in the United States but has operations in India. Even
with wages rising 15 percent a year, the cost for a computer programmer
or a middle manager in India remains a small fraction of that for a
similar employee in the United States. A programmer with three to five
years' experience makes about $25,000 in India but about $65,000 in the
United States. But the wage savings from offshore outsourcing have
never translated directly into overall savings; typically, an
outsourcing contract between an American company and an Indian vendor
saves less than half as much as the wage differences would imply.
Praba Manivasager, the chief executive of Renodis Global Outsourcing
Solutions, a company based in Minneapolis that advises clients on
outsourcing projects, sees two reasons for that. The first involves the
costs of the transition from doing work in-house to offshore - usually
a one- to two-year process. During the transition, employees of vendors
based in India must work in the United States. The second involves the
cost of maintaining the relationship. Employees of the American company
must make frequent trips to India, and the vendor needs some continued
American presence. "The vendor says, 'We'll save 40 to 60
percent; we'll give you such a great rate - $22 or whatever,' '' Mr.
Manivasager said, referring to hourly wages. "But if the onshore rate
is $50 to $55, and you have half the people onshore, the savings aren't
going to be what are advertised." IT is not as if offshore
outsourcing is going away. Indian outsourcing companies may simply
shift operations to cities like Nasik and Ponticherry, where wage
inflation is relatively mild. Others may outsource work offshore
themselves, to China, Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe. Still, most
experts say India is years ahead of countries like China in its
workers' facility with English, its telecommunications and the
sophistication of its legal system Another possibility is that American companies may turn increasingly to global companies based in the United States - like I.B.M. Business Consulting Services, E.D.S. and Hewlett-Packard.
These companies have the advantage of locations in dozens of countries
around the world - E.D.S. is in 57 - so they can constantly shift work
to the most efficient destination. That trend may bring a
measure of relief to American workers. Of E.D.S.'s 135,000 global
employees, nearly half are based in the United States. Wipro, by
contrast, bases more than 80 percent of its 28,000 employees in India.
(The difference is that E.D.S. uses American workers for the onshore
component of its American contracts; Wipro uses Indian workers,
dispatching them to the United States when necessary.) If the
increasing competitiveness of the Indian labor market begins to benefit
companies like E.D.S. and I.B.M., outsourcing may one day no longer be
a dirty word in a presidential election. Home Delivery of The Times from $2.90/week - Act Now!
|