banner
Home - Introduction - Methodology - Results - Summary - References

 

 

References

    1. Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Joey F. George, Joseph S. Valacich, Modern Systems Analysis and Design, 5ed, 2008.
    2. Annette L. du Plessis, A method for CASE tool evaluation, Information & Management, Volume 25, Issue 2, August 1993, Pages 93-102
    3. Louis A. Le Blanc, Willard M. Korn, A structured approach to the evaluation and selection of CASE tools, SAC '92: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM/SIGAPP symposium on Applied computing: technological challenges of the 1990's ,March 1992
    4. Diane Lending, Norman L. Chervany, The use of CASE tools, SIGCPR '98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, June 1998
    5. L. Zucconi, Selecting a CASE tool, SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes , Volume 14 Issue 2, April 1989
    6. Barbara Ann Kitchenham, Lesley M. Pickard, Evaluating software engineering methods and tools: part 9: quantitative case study methodology, SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes , Volume 23 Issue 1, January 1998
    7. David Budgen, Mitchell Thomson, CASE tool evaluation: experiences from an empirical study, Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 67, Issue 2, 15 August 2003, Pages 55-75
    8. Information Technology, Guideline for the evaluation and selection of CASE tools. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG4, ISO/IEC 14102:1995(E).
    9. Susan J Chinn, Scott J Lloyd, Eric Kyper, Contemporary Usage of CASE Tools in U. S. Colleges and Universities, Journal of Information Systems Education. West Lafayette: Winter 2005. Vol. 16, Iss. 4; p. 429 (8 pages)
    10. Vicky Sauter, Information System Analysis, http://www.umsl.edu/~sauterv/analysis/analysis_links.html#case , retrieved on November 8, 2009.
    11. G.H. Travassos, J. Biolchini, Systematic review applied to software engineering, in: Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES) – Tutorials, Jopo Pessoa, Brazil, 2007, p. 436.
    12. P. Brereton, B.A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, M. Turner and M. Khalil, Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain, Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007), pp. 571–583.
    13. Brian M. McCarthy, Rip Stauffer, Six sigma: enhancing six sigma through simulation with iGrafx process for six sigma, WSC '01: Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation, December 2001
    14. John F. Vick, Charles R. Harrell, Introduction to ProcessModel and ProcessModel 9000, WSC '98: Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, December 1998
    15. Juha-Pekka Tolvanen, Matti Rossi, MetaEdit+: defining and using domain-specific modeling languages and code generators, OOPSLA '03: Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 2003
    16. Juha-Pekka Tolvanen, MetaEdit+: domain-specific modeling for full code generation demonstrated [GPCE], OOPSLA '04: Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, October 2004
    17. Juha-Pekka Tolvanen, MetaEdit+: integrated modeling and metamodeling environment for domain-specific languages, OOPSLA '06: Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, October 2006
    18. Aydaen Lynch, Darynn Flango, Rob Smith, Matthew Lang, Experiences of using rational rose/visio for UML modeling in an undergraduate software engineering course: a student perspective, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , Volume 19 Issue 5, May 2004
    19. Steve Murphy, Neil MacKinnon, Designing UML and UML-based diagrams for technical documentation: where are we now?, SIGDOC '08: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, September 2008
    20. Ji Kim, Prototyping with Visio, Effective Prototyping for Software Makers, 2007, Pages 486-517
    21. Aydaen Lynch, Darynn Flango, Rob Smith, Matthew Lang, Experiences of using rational rose/visio for UML modeling in an undergraduate software engineering course: a student perspective, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , Volume 19 Issue 5, May 2004
    22. Robert Pierce, Scott Tilley, Automatically connecting documentation to code with rose, SIGDOC '02: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation, October 2002
    23. Alexander Egyed, Instant consistency checking for the UML, ICSE '06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, May 2006
    24. Alexander Egyed, UML/Analyzer: A Tool for the Instant Consistency Checking of UML Models, ICSE '07: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering, May 2007
    25. Jean Hartmann, Claudio Imoberdorf, Michael Meisinger, UML-Based integration testing, ISSTA '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis, August 2000
    26. James R. McCoy, Requirements use case tool (RUT), OOPSLA '03: Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, October 2003
    27. Hubert A. Johnson, Laura Wilkinson, Case tools in object-oriented analysis and design, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , Volume 19 Issue 2, December 2003
    28. Mei Zhang, ArgoUML, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , Volume 21 Issue 5, May 2006
    29. Lerina Aversano, Thierry Bodhuin, Gerardo Canfora, Raffaele Esposito, Maria Tortorella, Evolution of business processes towards eBusiness using a critiquing approach, SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing, March 2004

     

    <<Previous