Andragogy After Twenty-Five Years
By
Daniel D. Pratt
Spring 1993
Sources:
See bibliography. It seems to be quite small and a reprint of his 1988 article. He relies heavily on Podeschi and Carlson (attached).
Case:
The purpose of this paper (p. 15) is "to ask one central question: What contribution has andragogy made to our understanding of adult learning?" Pratt contends that the literature relating to andragogy has not been "coherent in thematic focus or clear in defining the central concept of learning".
In order to assess the above mentioned question, Dr. Pratt says that four subordinate questions must be asked:
Pratt makes an interesting statement in summing up his article (p. 21) "We cannot say, with any confidence, that andragogy has been tested and found to be, as so many have hoped, either the basis for a theory of adult learning or a unifying concept for adult education". He also cites two tensions that characterize the debate over andragogy: 1) there is a tension between freedom and authority and 2) there is a tension between human agency and social structures.
I believe he has made a weak case when he says andragogy has not been tested as he has stated that it is widely accepted in North America and virtually all the world. How much more evidence does he need? He even states that "andragogy has made an enormous contribution to adult education".
Reviewed by: Roger A. Mason
Seminar- Dialogues in Andragogy, Winter Semester 2000
UMSL- Dr. John Henschke