Andragogy After Twenty-Five Years

By

Daniel D. Pratt

Spring 1993

Sources:

See bibliography. It seems to be quite small and a reprint of his 1988 article. He relies heavily on Podeschi and Carlson (attached).

Case:

The purpose of this paper (p. 15) is "to ask one central question: What contribution has andragogy made to our understanding of adult learning?" Pratt contends that the literature relating to andragogy has not been "coherent in thematic focus or clear in defining the central concept of learning".

In order to assess the above mentioned question, Dr. Pratt says that four subordinate questions must be asked:

    1. What is learning? He believes (p. 16) that from Knowles five assumptions that first, the world may exist, but it is the individual’s experience of that world that is most important to learning and second, learning is more subjective than objective with an emphasis on individual interpretation. He sums this up by saying that "therefore, andragogy appears to rest on two implicit principles of learning: first, knowledge is assumed to be actively constructed by the learner and second, learning is an interactive process of interpretation, integration, and transformation of one’s experiential world.
    2. What are the antecedents of adult learning? In this section, Dr. Pratt deals with social structures defined as "those institutions and systems in society that produce and reproduce rules and resources that influence the communication of meaning, the exercise of power, and the legitimization and judgment of conduct….. (p. 17). Pratt strongly believes that andragogy does not acknowledge the vast influence of these structures on the formation of the person’s identity and ways of interpreting the world. Is this important?
    3. How can we facilitate adult learning? A major statement here (p. 19) is "the needs and experience of the learner take precedence over the expertise of the instructor". The argument in this section deals with evaluation of the learner. Should the student have so much control? As Pratt states " it also begs the question of whether such a relationship can or should take precedence over situational factors in the exercise of individual freedom and control over instructional processes, particularly the evaluation of learning" (p. 20).
    4. What are the purposes and aims of adult learning? Pratt relies on Podeschi and Carlson for this discussion. Carlson has stated that Knowles problem was that his preaching did not live up to his practice. Pratt states that andragogy appears to be based on five fundamental values or beliefs (p. 21) and that "collectively these beliefs constitute a particular worldview that legitimates certain forms of learning, approaches to instruction, and is saturated with the ideals of individualism and entrepreneurial democracy.

Pratt makes an interesting statement in summing up his article (p. 21) "We cannot say, with any confidence, that andragogy has been tested and found to be, as so many have hoped, either the basis for a theory of adult learning or a unifying concept for adult education". He also cites two tensions that characterize the debate over andragogy: 1) there is a tension between freedom and authority and 2) there is a tension between human agency and social structures.

I believe he has made a weak case when he says andragogy has not been tested as he has stated that it is widely accepted in North America and virtually all the world. How much more evidence does he need? He even states that "andragogy has made an enormous contribution to adult education".

Reviewed by: Roger A. Mason

Seminar- Dialogues in Andragogy, Winter Semester 2000

UMSL- Dr. John Henschke