Technological Determinism
Autonomous
Technology
- Technology develops
independently.
- Irreversible
forward (and outward) expansion.
- Unstoppable.
Ellul:
Not necessarily so, but certainly taking on such characteristics.
- Problem: humans
have abdicated responsibility.
- Western values-
we favor technological innovation.
- Technological
innovation has been institutionalized.
What makes technology seem
autonomous?
Langdon Winner:
Autonomous Technology==> Lack of conscious control
- Individual developments
are, perhaps, controlled; but Technological Evolution (innovation as
a whole) is not.
- Technological
Drift: much of modern change is an accumulation of unintended and unanticipated
consequences. We don't try to control this, but merely adapt.
- System embeddedness
constrains and conditions our cultural system: It is confronted as THE WORLD
by those born into it. Result: The Loss of HUMAN AGENCY.
- Winner on "Do
Technologies have Politics."
- Winner on "Techne
and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society"
- Technique ("the
ensemble of practices by which one uses available resources in order to achieve
certain valued ends") is the milieu in which humans exist- it has replaced
nature.
- It is artificial.
- It is Autonomous.
- It is self-determining.
- It is characterized
by growth, but is not goal directed.
- Means have come
to have precedence over ends.
- Its parts are
intrinsically interrelated an inseparable.
- Development
of individual techniques is an "ambivalent" phenomenon.
- All social phenomena
are situated within "Technique."
- It comprises
organizational and psycho-sociological techniques, so they can not determine
or control it. Humans must (are being forced to) adapt to it(!).
- Modern human
values, choice, and ideas are dominated by Technique. Our choices are already
incorporated within the technological process.
False Problems
- We make too
much of the problems of technology. It contains the solution. We benefit more
from it than we would without it.
- Morals are not
being eroded. A new morality and ethical system are emerging.
- Aesthetics is
not dead: new forms of expression are being created.
- Human reality,
values, and powers are not being eliminated.
Real Problems
Can humans (and which ones)
remain the masters in a world of means: Who decides?
- People (seem to)
exploit technology- yet technology is autonomous
- The human actor
is more and more the object of techniques
- Is the end point
of technical development the betterment of the human condition?
- Do we just passively
participate in technological progress- is "appropriate technology" possible?
- For humans to
remain "subject," we must center upon and accept common values and
behavior towards Technique
Can a new civilization
appear inclusive of technique?
- We live in a
technical world of material objects: Technique's interest in "man" is as an
object.
- Technical growth=>
growth in power- limitless and perhaps, uncontrollable. As power expands,
Value declines. "When man is able to accomplish anything at all, there is
no value that can be proposed to him."
- Technique can
not produce Freedom (animal vs. Human needs).
- "New limits
and technical oppression have taken the place of older, natural constraints..."
- And, we can't
go back.
Traditional "Solutions"
The Problem Will Solve
Itself
- Traditional
Marxism.
- Technocracy.
- Economic models:
Material development provides a basis for human expansion.
The Problem Demands a Modification
of the Whole of Humanity
- Einstein: A
"superstate" led by philosopher-scientists
- Others: A re-invention
of spirituality
Intermediate: Teilhard
de Chardin- "Spirit has contrived Technique as a means of organizing dispersed
matter..." An end stage to the process of evolution- unification. "Conscious
evolution"??
Ellul rejects all of these!
- He focuses on the need
for the institutionalization of firmer forms of social and moral control
- Perhaps a better answer
is found through the work of Langdon Winner, as expressed in Larry Hickman's
"Autonomous Technology in Fiction": Rather than "Technique" in Ellul's sense
we need to distinguish
- Technique as technology's
"software"- skills, methods and routines
- Technology's "apparatus"-
technics, the "hardware"
- Technology's "Organization"-
The Rationalization of Human Affairs
- If these are related,
yet distinctive elements, then the problems they propose require different
responses from the human actor.
McGinn:
Value of the Position of Technological Determinism?
- Hard version:
- Technology determines
social existence
- Marx: "In acquiring
new productive forces men change their mode of production, and in changing
their mode of production they change their way of living-they change all
their social relations. The hand-mill gives you society with the feudal
lord; the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist." (See note
STS page 94)
- Perhaps technological
change determines the range of options, but social reality determines which
options are actualized: cultural beliefs, values. Nuclear power or Solar,
Assembly line or Quality Circles.
- Soft version:
- Technological
changes are the most important source of change: Catalyst, necessarily but
not sufficient
- Yet:
significance of religious and political ideology and significant change
- Twentieth
Century as distinctive
- Judgement
call
Alternatives to Technological
Determinism: Agency, Myth, and Dereification. Understanding
of Technology as a Social Phenomenon: The
Social Construction of Technology
URL:
http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/280/tecdeterm.html
Owner: Robert O. Keel: rok@umsl.edu
Last Updated:
Wednesday, January 27, 2016 8:20