Narcotics
(See:Drugs in American Society, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th editions, Erich Goode, McGraw-Hill, 1999/2005/2008/2012/2014. Chapter 11/10/12 and Drugs, Society, and Human Behavior, Ray and Ksir, Mosby, 1993 (and 2004). Chapter 14; Statistics are gathered from the various surveys discussed, especially: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.)
Opiates
"Can anybody lend me a dime?"
The HARD Drugs!
(Erowid, From the Indiana University Prevention)
- Street level competition: Heroin versus Cocaine
- The "stuff" of social images about drugs and drug users
- Heroin on the streets
- Opiates are considered to be some of the most important pharmaceuticals worldwide, and their use is considered to constitute the most serious problem, too.
Opium (photo from erowid)
- Origin: Several millennia ago- Middle East
- Papaver somniferum: Annual plant, after petals drop off- 7-10 day period prior to seed pod maturing- pod is sliced vertically. Overnight a white substance oozes out, oxidizes and turns reddish-brown and gummy. This gum is scraped off with a special curved blade==> Raw opium. (See: Opium Growing in India) (Opium Drying)
- Early Egyptians (1500 B.C.): used for pain relief and to soothe the crying of babies.
- Greece (100 B.C.): Homer's Odyssey: Despair over Ulysses' loss and death of friends alleviated by the daughter of Zeus serving a drink containing opium.
- Galen, last of the great Greek physicians: "Cure-all"
- Also sold in cakes and candies throughout Greece: Recreational use.
- Knowledge of the uses of opium lost throughout the "Dark Ages"
- Arabic world: Koran forbade alcohol=> Opium and Hashish became the primary social drugs
- Traders, Fighters, and Explorers: spread use of opium.
- Used opium as a trade product- sold seeds to Chinese (by 900 A.D. mentioned in Chinese Medical writing).
- Arabic physicians make substantial contributions to medicine and develop insights about opium: first description of addiction circa 1000 A.D.
- Early 1500, European medicine- Paracelsus: Laudanum; called opium the "stone of immortality"
- Dr. Thomas Sydenham (English "Hippocrates", circa 1700's): reinvented laudanum: 2 oz. Opium, 1 oz. saffron, a dram of cinnamon and cloves- all dissolved in 1 pint of Canary wine.
- 1644 Chinese Emperor outlawed tobacco use: partly responsible for spread of opium use. Prior use of tobacco with opium led to development of opium smoking- this spread rapidly (quicker onset)
- 1729: non-medicinal use of opium outlawed: Smuggled in from India. Highly profitable enterprise (especially for the British)
- Britain and the Dutch had been attempting to get trade set up with China since before 1500. (Opium in China)
- By 1700: limited trade began through the port of Canton: English took tea, and began smuggling in opium (Chinese apparently weren't interested in any of the legitimate goods the English had.
- In India, opium was legal- the government was the British East India Company- held monopoly on opium. Auctioned chests of opium to private merchants, given to selected British firms, who sold to Chinese merchants in Canton.
- Each chest=> 120 pounds of opium. 1729- 200 smuggled in, 1838- 25,000
- First Opium War, 1839: Emperor sent honest man to end the practice. He was successful, and destroyed 20,000 chests ($6 million).
- After incident involving alcohol and the death of a Chinese civilian, war was declared
- 2 years of fighting- Britain won. Got Hong Kong and $6/$20 million. "Trade" in opium continued, but declined. 1893: moral protest and by 1906 bill passed- ending the process in 1913. Hong Kong reverts to Chinese rule: July 1, 1997.
19th Century Use and Patterns
- 1803: Frederick Sertürner (Hannover, Germany) conducts experiments and isolates the primary active ingredient in opium, names it- Morphium after Morpheus, the god of dreams.
- Use grows slowly, but by 1831, Sertuener is given the French version of the Nobel Prize.
- Further work reveals over 30 alkaloids, with codeine isolated in 1832 (Greek word for poppy head
- These drugs were viewed as major medical breakthroughs, effective in treating a variety of human ailments.
- 1853 marks another breakthrough, in technology- the perfection of the hypodermic syringe, making the administration of morphine more efficient and effective. It was thought that IV injection would not be as addicting as oral use!!
- Wars: Civil War (1861-1865), Prussian-Austrian (1866), and Franco-Prussian (1870) led to the widespread use of morphine in injectable form- "Soldier's Disease" (this terminology is suspect. Although still cited in Ray and Ksir, 2004, and repeated in Mosher and Akins, Drugs and Drug Policy, Sage, 2007, page 95, it appears that the reference to "soldier's disease" or "army disease" may have originated in the 20th century as part of campaign to prohibit narcotics. See, "The Mythical Roots of US Drug Policy: Soldier's Disease and Addiction in the Civil War," by Jerry Mandel (local copy). Mandel's argument makes sense since the idea of addiction, especially as a "disease," did not become commonly accepted until the 20th century.
- Throughout the 19th Century the use of opiates spread quite rapidly. Most use was instrumental. The drugs could be bought openly, Sears carried syringe kits in their catalogs, by the end of the century the number of addicts is estimated at being well over 100,000-- some suggest, millions (probably an overestimate).
- The typical addict was characterized as being: respectable, older (middle-aged), female, middle class, rural/suburban and white.
- Opium and its various extracts and preparations were widely used by creative individuals: writers, artists, etc. Thomas De Quincy, perhaps most importantly known for his attempts to explore the effects of the drug laudanum on consciousness: "The confessions of an Opium Eater."
- Opium in San Francisco
- Samuel Taylor Coleridge: "Kubla Khan" and Elizabeth Barrett Browning were also well known users.
- Heroin was synthesized in 1874 (2 acetyl groups were added to the morphine molecule- increasing the lipid solubility- leading to more rapid transferal to the brain. Heroin is 3-6x as potent as morphine, although the pharmacology of the drugs is identical.
- Heroin was originally marketed in 1898 as a Non-addicting substitute for codeine- a cough suppressant. It was viewed as a "perfect" drug, and was thought to hold potential as a cure for "Morphinism" It's addictive potential did not become understood until well into the 20th Century.
Opiates, Opioids, and Narcotics
Schaffer Library on Opiates (see especially the online chapters from "licit and Illicit Drugs)
Morphine(10% by weight of opium)
Codeine
Laudanum (10% opium and alcohol) (erowid image)
Paregoric (4% opium and alcohol) (wikipedia)
Heroin (diacetylmorphine)
Dilaudid (Hydromophone) (semi-synthetic) (erowid)
Oxycodone (Percodan) (semi-synthetic, from Thebaine) (wikipedia) (erowid)
Hydrocodone (Vicodin) (erowid)
Buphrenorphine
Meperidine (Demerol)
Propoxyphene (Darvon)
Dolophine (Methadone) (wikipedia)
Pentazocine (Talwin)
Fentanyl (Sublimaze) (80x as potent as morphine) (wikipedia)(Fentanyl overdoses)
LD50-- 10-15x ED50
- Outlaws sale and distribution: Heavy tax penalty.
- Leads to creation of the Bureau of Narcotics (tax collection agency) and a variety of federally run heroin clinics (all closed during the 1920 due to negative publicity and shifting attitudes concerning heroin and medicine.
- Other rulings effectively eliminate the medical use and prescription of heroin.
"The provision protecting physicians, however, contained a joker hidden in the phrase, "in the course of his professional practice only. "After passage of the law, this clause was interpreted by law-enforcement officers to mean that a doctor could not prescribe opiates to an addict to maintain his addiction. Since addiction was not a disease, the argument went, an addict was not a patient, and opiates dispensed to or prescribed for him by a physician were therefore not being supplied "in the course of his professional practice." Thus a law apparently intended to ensure the orderly marketing of narcotics was converted into a law prohibiting the supplying of narcotics to addicts, even on a physician's prescription." (The Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs by Edward M. Brecher and the Editors of Consumer Reports Magazine, 1972. Chapter 8. The Harrison Narcotic Act (1914))
- By 1920, distinctive shift in the addict population, the image of the drug, and use patterns. The creation of the "addict sub-culture."
- 1925: Linder Case successfully challenges the regulations prohibiting doctors from "maintaining" an addict. Due to the recent history of harassment (as many as 25,000 physicians were arrested over a total of 25 years, 3,000 served prison sentences and thousands had their licenses suspended), few doctors would.
- 1962 ruling: Robinson v. California, reaffirms ruling in "Linder" and suggests present legal policies concerning the use of opiates in medical settings is unconstitutional
- Even during the 1920's a number of publicly funded "heroin clinics" were opened, but administrative problems and public stereotypes led to their closing.
- The Harrison Act of 1914 is seen by many (Alfred Lindesmith) as being the source of our modern problems, it:
- Created a criminal class that had not existed previously (being an addict was criminal, by definition by 1920; and their involvement led to a variety of criminal behaviors- Economic/Compulsive, increasing price of heroin.
- Was essential in the development of the "addict subculture" (Lindesmith, one of the first to study its formation and suggest the link to our social and legal policies, was attacked by Anslinger who attempted to have Lindesmith fired from his university position)
- The number of addicts remained rather small and non-problematic through the 1940's (approximately 20,000 known)
- Throughout the 1950's and 1960's there was dramatic growth;
- Preble and Casey: The recruitment power of the Subculture of Addicts
- The significance of the "career" and the group interaction.
- Addiction as a socio-cultural rather than a pharmacological reality
- Motivation for remaining in the subculture: It's a Meaningful life!
- Networks and satisfaction of accomplishment: Meeting the challenge- survival and economics.
Norman Zinberg: Euphoria seekers (compulsive) and Maintainers
Goal is not getting a fix so much as it is succeeding in getting the money, and maintaining the "structure of the group."
"Chippying" or the "chipper"-- Controlled use patterns
All in study used heroin, IV, used for extended period of time, some with periods of compulsive use.
Controlled users different in that:
- Rarely used more than once a day
- Were able to keep a "stash"
- Avoided associating with "hard-core" addicts
- Used the drug recreationally rather than to treat depression
- Knew their dealer
- Did not use to "escape" reality
- Rituals and sanctions control use patterns.
- Compare to Alcohol use: Most who use alcohol are not compulsive or addicted
- Group Norms and Values:
- Define moderate use, condemn compulsive
- Limit use to physical, psychological, and social settings conducive to positive or 'safe' experiences
- Develop means of identifying untoward drug effects: test drugs to avoid OD
- Compartmentalize drug use and support non-drug related obligations and relationships.
"If, as I contend, the use of opiates and other illicit drugs is indeed an evolving social process, the recognition that the social setting strongly influences the capacity for control offers an alternative to prohibition. Elements of potential control are active in all groups of opiate users, even among addicts. Many opiate users representing many different styles of use have precepts, however punitive, that dictate how they can use their drug without becoming addicted or suffering physical and psychological damage, or, at least, how they can use the drug in order to get what they desire from it. Is it not possible that using groups will gradually develop these ideas into social sanctions and rituals similar to those that govern acceptable alcohol use (Zinberg et al. 1975)? Although the sample studied in my NIDA project is small, the fact that many of those who fulfilled the project's stringent criteria for controlled use had formerly been addicted suggests the need to consider approaches other than abstinence. For example, assisting the maintenance of controlled use could be a practical means of preventing drug abuse with the least social cost; and experimenting with this alternative in a careful and gradual way would not obstruct the effort to discourage the use of the opiates generally." (Norman E. Zinberg, "Nonaddictive Opiate Use in Robert 1. DuPont, Avram Goldstein, and John O'Donnel (eds.), Handbook on Drug Abuse (Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1979), pp. 303-313.)
Drug Effects and the Heroin Scene
- The dangers of heroin use are most intimately related to the social context of use, and especially the illegal status of the drug
- 1% of all heroin addicts die each year: very high rate for their age group. Overdose Mysteries.
- Subcultural norms- especially route of administration and needle sharing: quite problematic. AIDS, the "taste face," etc. A structure for developing a sense of self.
- Quality control: potency, market competition, adulterants. Yet the daily pursuit is for the highest potency: If one OD's it's "Righteous Dope" and the rush is on to acquire it.
- Rosenbaum: Difficulties in Taking Care of Business
Yet, in other contexts: not so problematic
- Use by "respectable" people-- especially doctors and other medical professionals
- 3-4,000 heavy users (usually narcotics)
- Pure and standardized substance
- Good, clean needles
- Awareness of nutritional needs
- Not a money problem
- Recorded instance of individuals in this type of setting using morphine for 30-40 years with no debilitating effects
- Other Effects: Alcohol worse than heroin and cocaine?
Why Use Heroin?
- Waldorf: Immersion in a social world. Many background factors, but the subculture, its networks, friends and peers: group behavior and acceptance are important elements in understanding the process.
- The individual's identity becomes determined by these association, prestige, respect and excitement.
- Preble and Casey: "The career of the heroin users serves a dual purpose for the slum inhabitant; it enables him to escape, not from purposeful activity, but from the monotony of an existence severely limited by social constraints, and, at the same time, it provides a way for him to gain revenge on society for the injustices and deprivation he has experienced."
- The subculture of the addict is a distorted mirror of dominant values: Success, Competition, Personal Ambition and Initiative
- Creates a world far removed from the banality of the straight world: here is something different, exciting.
- Significant element of learning, coming to appreciate the drug's effect: Pleasure and Pain as the most intense life has to offer. Sexual overtones, as well.
Kicking the Habit
- The world of heroin use is different from that of other drugs: Pot smoker- "straight" means no drug effect. Heroin: "getting straight"-- injected and back to "normal"
- The drug is viewed with magical powers, a certain religious quality to the behavior pattern
- Abstention==> Stupid. The world is filled with pain and misery. Why face that?
- Relevance of other things and people: Insofar as they relate to getting and using dope.
- Heroin valued more than money, better than money: "It's a commodity"
- Love/hate relationship with the dealer (vs. Pusher)
- Quitting=> giving up far more than the drug. Lifestyle and networks. Turning on and kicking are both group phenomenon
- Being addicted is perhaps of little consequence: Viet Nam veterans, most had signs of physical dependence. 50% just stopped. 14% maintained. Rest: used sporadically.
- Treatment: Variety. Multiple enrollments.
- Drug Policy Alliance
Myths, Reality and the Future
- Psychiatric Image: Weak, immature, irresponsible.
- Sociologists: Retreatist/ double failures.
- Addict: Reject societal definition of responsibility
- Prestige, Status, and Responsibility: Habit
- Preble and Casey: "Their behavior is anything but an escape from life. They are actively engaged in meaningful activities and relationships seven days a week. The brief moments of euphoria....a small fraction of their daily lives....They are always on the move and must be alert, flexible, and resourceful. The surest way to identify heroin users in a slum neighborhood is to observe the way people walk. The heroin user walks with a fast purposeful stride, as if he is late for an important appointment--indeed, he is....He is, in short, taking care of business."
- AIDS: For white males--homosexual behavior. For the rest of our society: AIDS is a disease of addicts, their sex partners and their children.
- Comeback trail??
- Quantity and quality increasing: 14-80% pure depending on type (Columbian/Mexican) and location (DEA Pluse Check: Mid Year 2000)
- Current MTF Data
- Current NSDUH Data: 2013 1.8% report lifetime use, .3% report past year use, and .1% report past month use (US population 12 and older). Rates for OxyContin use are about twice that for heroin.
- Due to social image: unlikely to become as popular as cocaine.
- But, new forms of use: "Chasing the Dragon" and a new smokable "speedball"--heroin and crack.
- Alternating between heroin and crack or cocaine, some areas: MDMA and Ketamine are popular. (DEA Pluse Check: Mid Year 2000)
- Combination with methamphetamine/ice.
- Alcohol use remains popular
Psychotherapeutic Drugs
URL: http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/180/narcotic.html
Owner: Robert O. Keel rok@umsl.edu
References and Credits for this Page of Notes
Last Updated: Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:42 AM