The Divine Mr. Morton
UFO Magazine Volume 10, Number 4 (July/August 1995) prints a
letter from Steamshovel editor Kenn Thomas defending UFO lecturer
Sean Morton, who was labeled as a cultist in the previous issue
of UFO. The letter pointed out that a critic of Morton's, Russ
Estes, was proven wrong on the Montel Williams Show when he
claimed that Morton did not have the undergraduate degree from USC
he claims. Morton proved the claim by insisting that Montel's
post-production people electronically splice in a copy of the
degree on subsequent broadcasts. Estes now admits that Morton has
the degree--although he complains he was cut off by Montel before
he could fully articulate his charge that Morton lied about it
(cut-off or not, this was clearly Estes' message). Readers remain
in the dark about Estes' other charge, that Morton doesn't have
the Doctorate of Divinity from The Berachah University because
"The Berachah Church of Houston, Texas does not issue ANY degrees
of that type." Are Berachah University and Berachah Church
different institutions? Did Morton go through a course of study
at one or the other that was a non-degree conferring
institution's equivalent to a doctorate program? Estes answers
neither question.
And just how divine does one have to be to speak frankly
about alternative views of the UFO phenomenon? Thomas' letter
makes the glib observation that divinity degrees can be had from
the classified ads in Rolling Stone. Estes argues with Morton's
credentials, not with his claims, ideas or the interpretation of
the video documentation of UFOs he brings to his lectures. He
presents his audiences with unusual data, tells them what he
knows and what he thinks, and lets them make up their own minds.
He does not demand the blind obedience of followers. Estes'
response notwithstanding, UFO Magazine's characterization of
Morton as a cult leader is still wrong.
This should not dissuade readers from picking up the new
issue, however. It concentrates on a "UFO and War" theme and
includes several articles reflecting good research and
fascinating anecdotes, including research director Don Ecker's
Vietnam encounter with the infamous black helicopters. In a field
rife with disinformation, little doubt remains that UFO Magazine
is a standard bearer for credible research. Surely this is part
of the reason that it is quick to point a nervous finger at
someone with Sean Morton's unusual sensibilities.
(Also, poor editing marred Kenn Thomas' letter to UFO,
turning the word "geo-psychic" into the nonsensical "geo-physic",
for instance. The entire letter is reproduced below.)
Dear UFO:
I feel obliged to come to the defense of Sean Morton,
someone UFO identified as a cult leader in its current issue
("Cults...Or Cutting Edge?", UFO Magazine, Volume 10,
Number 3, May/June 1995.) The UFO article left the impression
that Sean delivers the dicta of Tibetan monks and Native
American spirits to worshipful and incredulous followers. I have
met Sean many times and interviewed him once for Steamshovel
Press and I can attest that this is far from the case.
I am sure that Sean wouldn't deny anyone the right to regard
what he says as hooey on the scale of the Republican's Contract
On America. I also know that he brings some fascinating video
documentation to his lectures and workshops on the UFO circuit
and never fails to discuss their merits (or lack thereof) in Q&As
with the audience. Moreover, he has done a great deal to bring
the Area 51 situation to the attention of the public, even if one
views his work only as theater.
However, my understanding is that the only pre-requisite to
joining Sean Morton's group, Delphi Associates, is to pay the
newsletter subscription cost. It does not even require the belief
that certain divination techniques (as with the "earthquake
sensitives"--people who seem to have the apprehensions that some
animals have prior to a quake--that Sean networks with) have
information value. Also, Sean's reality paradigm includes the
notion of geo-psychic mediation (my term, not Sean's); meditation
and prayers can alter the events he "predicts". This renders the
success rate of his prophesies, actually quite impressive at
times despite what was reported in UFO, a relatively inadequate
measure of his work.
Also, I don't know that Russ Estes disproved Sean's
assertion of holding a Doctorate of Divinity (why hoax it? aren't
these available through the classified ads in Rolling Stone?),
but I do know that when Estes challenged the existence of Sean's
undergraduate degree at USC on the Montel Williams show, he was
proven wrong. Montel did not allow enough time for Sean to defend
himself, but Sean insisted that the program flash the actual
degree on the screen in post-production. It goes by in a flash,
and without explanation, but it's there and I'll be happy to copy
the videotape for doubters.
Best,
Kenn Thomas
Editor/Publisher
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous Latest Words:
Grateful Dead Claim Conspiracy of A Thousand Fools
What's the Frequency, Dan?
Fusion Paranoia: Of Norman Olson, Wilhelm Reich, Robert
Fletcher, Steamshovel and the New York Press
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------