Drugs and
Crime
(See:Drugs
in American Society, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th editions, Erich Goode, McGraw-Hill,
1999/2005/2008/2012/2014. Chapter 12/13)
Thomas
Szasz, in Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts,
and Pushers (1985), suggests that we have, through our definition of certain
drugs as evil, created a new population of scapegoats. As the religious ideologies
of the past have been replaced by the therapeutic ideologies of the present;
we have replaced the witches of earlier days with the "addict-criminals"
of today. Just as the discovery and control of witches required the development,
and in turn sustained, the institution of the inquisition, the treatment and
control of the "addict-criminal" becomes the focus of activity for
the "criminal justice industry."
These extrapolations of
the ideas of Szasz provide us with an interesting backdrop for exploring the
social reality of the drugs-crime connection.
Central Concerns:
- Does drug use cause crime?
- Is there some intrinsic
property associated with certain drugs that leads the user to engage in criminal
behavior?
- Do drugs (drug use) cause
violence?
- Do drugs (drug use) destroy
the human community?
- Does crime or criminal
behavior, perhaps, lead people into drug use?
- What
drugs (types of drug use) are we talking about?
- legal instrumental?
- legal recreational?
- Illegal instrumental?
- Illegal recreational?
- What crime are we talking
about?
- White collar/corporate? (slavery and chocolate)
- Institutional?
- Street Crime?
- Crimes of Violence?
- Property Crime?
Crime
- Murder: 5.7-5.7/100,000
(9.4/100,000 in late 1980s)(5.4 for 2016)
- Rape: 32.1-31/100,000
(41/100,000
in late 1980s)(41.2 for 2016)
- Robbery: 142-149.4/100,000
(257/100,000 in late 1980s)(105.5 for 2016)
- Aggravated
Assault: 295-287.5/100,000 (430/100,000 in late 1980s)(250.6 for 2016)
- Burglary: 740-729.4/100,000
(1,235/100,000 in late 1980s)
- Larceny-Theft: 2,414-2206.8/100,000
(3,200/100,000 in late 1980s)
- Motor Vehicle: 433-398.4/100,000
(658/100,000 in late 1980s)
- Arson: 30.4-24.7/100,000
- Hate Crimes: 7,489
incidents, 8,715 offenses, 9,100 victims
- Overall, ongoing decline
into 2014, rates inclreasing into 2017, but still overall: down significantly from peak years.
These (1-7) are the crimes
that most of us are concerned with and that we associate with the use of drugs
- Not all crimes are violent,
MOST aren't (~9.9 million non-violent vs. ~1.5 million violent)
- Those who engage in criminal
activity are not all the same
- Property criminals; NOT
necessarily violent
- Violent offenders; typically
property crimes, too.
And, there is no correlation between drug possession arrests and rates of drug use (1979-2015). Washington Post, Wonkblog, October 12, 2016. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/12/police-arrest-more-people-for-marijuana-use-than-for-all-violent-crimes-combined). See, the Human Rights Watch report, 10/12/2016.
Key Elements
of Understanding Criminal Behavior
- Most crime committed
by small number of people (6%). Violent crime extremely concentrated. Occasional
crime widespread, few are repeat serious offenders.
- Not much specialization,
wide range of offenses. But, non-serious are not linked to serious; serious
are linked to non-serious.
- Certain crimes predict
involvement in others
- As per #3, robbery==>
criminal lifestyle
- As per #3, violent crimes==>
also economic, and lifestyle
- Career pattern: Early
involvement (J.D.- esp. Violent and frequent), but most juvies do not become
adult offenders
- Correlates of J.D. and
Crime: school problems, poverty (inequality), lower IQ, problematic parenting,
abuse. (Independent of drug use in terms of influencing crime) (also correlates
to drug use)
- Low probability of arrest,
more frequent offenders-- lower probability per offense: Inciardi (Miami study)-
118,134 criminal events==> 286 arrests (1/413 for all crimes, for index crimes-
1/292. Criminal career (males) 13 years==> 3.5 arrests
- There is little deterrent
effect, especially for frequent, serious offender
Empiricism,
Correlation, and Causation
- Drug use and criminality
are very positively correlated
- No study has failed to
find the correlation
- Users of Drugs are extremely
more likely to:
- Participate
in a wide variety of criminal activity
- Engage in
more violent crime
- Engage in
more serious crime
- The more one uses drugs,
the more likely one is to be involved in criminal activity
- One of the FEW established
and agreed upon links
Studies:
Bureau of
Justice Statistics:
Research Note: Validity
of Self-Reports?
- Don't discount users
perspective
- Cross check with other
studies
- People are surprisingly
honest, forgetful.
- Interviews need to be
specific: Many of the studies cited and included in your readings demonstrate
the difference between responses to general questions and specific ones.
- Bruce
Johnson's Taking Care of Business: Most addicts if asked how much heroin
they use will over estimate by a factor of 2 or 3.
O'Donnell 1976
(In Goode, 1999)
Alcohol
Drinkers
|
Shoplift |
Break/Enter |
Non-drinkers |
16% |
5% |
Light drinkers |
31% |
6% |
Heavy Drinkers |
56% |
18% |
Illicit
Drug Users
|
Shoplift |
B and E |
No illicit
use |
29% |
6% |
Marijuana |
35% |
~8% |
Marijuana
and other drugs |
56% |
~18% |
Drugs other
than Marijuana |
62% |
24% |
There was a perfect, stepwise
increase of likelihood of criminal activity related to the extent of involvement
with the drug: The more one used a drug the greater the likelihood of engaging
in a range of criminal activity.
Nurco, Kinlock, and Hanlon,
"The Drugs-Crime Connection"
Focus on Variations,
Prevalence, and Inconsistencies
- Variety of user/addicts:
studies typically don't take into account
- Problem of official
statistics ("rap sheets") vs self-reports. Baltimore study-243
addicts, 2,869 arrests over 11 years; but 473,738 crime days==> ratio
arrests/days: .006
- Gauging criminal activity
of users requires more sophistication
- Self-reports: structured,
anonymous, interviewer with knowledge of subculture, specific temporal references
- Measurement should
reflect crime days/year at risk. Over time variations- cycles of use and
non-use. Means: 250-260 crime days/year during use cycle; 65 days/year during
non-use.
- Types of Addicts: use
dimension (quantity and frequency); crime dimension==> Successful Criminal
and Working Addict
- Types of Crime (rank
ordering) (Sample 375 users, 3 years, 215,015 offenses)
- Drug
sales (50%) (Inciardi 38%) (Johnson sales 34%, buys 28%)
- Larceny theft
- Shoplifting
- Burglaries
- Robbery/assault/auto
theft
- It's
a subcultural mix of drugs and crime!
Focus: Violent Crime:
- Small part of population,
lot's of crime
- Inciardi: 573 users,
6,000 violent crimes (2.8%) of their total criminal offenses.
- NY study 1981 ~40% murders==>
drug related.
- 1993 statistics: Nationwide
~6% of homicides, in largest urban areas: 18% homicide offenders, 16% victims
(7% both).
- Drug related homicides:
1987: 4.9%; 1994: 5.6%; 2000: 4.4%
- 1996: 8.8% of inmates
committed violent crime to obtain drug money.
- 1999: 11.5% of
inmates committed violent crime to obtain drug money
- More recent data: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
ADAM:
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program: 2000
Report)
(Drug
Testing Studies) (DUF: Drug
Use Forecasting)
- Drugs
in system (no etoh) at time of arrest. Voluntary and confidential.
- High participation
rates.
- Very high
levels
- Some cities
(St. Louis) 70-80%
- Average
(2000) data 63% (males); 62.5% (females)
- Cocaine:
most common 29.3% (m) and 33.3% (f) down from 45 (m); 49% (f) in 1990
- Marijuana:
40.8% (m) and 26.7% (f) up from 20% (m); 12% (f) in 1990 {longer detection
period}
- Opiates:
6% (m); 7.5% (f) (stable
over the 1990s)
- Methamphetamine
1.9% (m) and 5.3% (f) (not recorded in 1990)
- Issues:
- Only
those caught
- Sample
drawn only from counties with major cities
- Perhaps
relevant for generalization to the "criminal population, but clearly
not to the population as a whole
- 2004--funding
for ADAM ran out.
- 2007--funding
returns:
-
2012
ADAM II Report (fact
sheet)(ADAM Home)
- "Key
findings from the report:
- Marijuana
is the most commonly detected drug at the time of arrest.
- Cocaine (often ingested as crack), while the second most commonly detected drug in all but Sacramento, continued to show a significant decline in use everywhere.
- There has been a statistically significant, increasing trend in the percentage of ADAM arrestees testing positive for opiates in all but New York and Chicago (where there has been a decline).
- Methamphetamine remained a significant problem in Sacramento (40 percent testing positive) and Denver (13 percent testing positive) in 2012."
- 2014: ADAM II funding cut
Self Reports by Jail and
Prison Inmates
- UTI at time of offense:
1979- 32%; 1991- 31% (robbery and burglary highest)
- Heroin use ~25 times
the rate of general population
- All illicit drug use
~3X the rate
- 50% of prison inmates
in 1991 report having used illicit drug in the month prior to their offense
(43% in 1986 on a daily basis)
- The more drugs used,
and the "harder" the drugs; the greater the number of prior offenses
BUT: These striking correlations do not mean:
- That all drug users are
criminals
- That all criminals are
drug users
- That non-drug users do
not commit crimes
- That non-criminals are
non-drug users
Problems in the Drugs-Crime Link
- What do we mean by cause:
Direct (psychopharmacological) or Indirect?
- Explanation of the issue
of members of the drug using subculture have higher rates of criminality (is
it the drugs that cause the behavior?)
- Finally, problem exists
that the same categories of people who are likely to use drugs are also the
same categories of people who have higher rates of criminal activity.
- So
problems in sorting through all the connections, correlations and spurious
relationships
- Race,
Arrest, and Incarceration and the drug
war on minorities.
Theoretical
Models
Economic Crime
Violent Crime
-
- Psychopharmacological:
Direct cause
- Drug
produces changes that increases aggressiveness
- Alcohol
(disinhibition)
- Barbiturates
- ?PCP?
- ?Cocaine?
- Psychoactive
Substances and Violence (J. Roth, 1994, NIJ): "Of all psychoactive
substances, alcohol is the only one whose consumption has been shown
to commonly increase aggression. After large doses of..(other drugs)...
certain individuals may experience violent outbursts, probably because
of preexisting psychosis.
-
Economic-Compulsive
- Crime
as instrumental: pay for expensive habit
- Typically
non-violent: Larceny-theft, burglary
- But,
robbery rates high-- Heroin,
Cocaine
- Systemic
- Violence
as an integral part of the structure
and culture of illicit drug use
- Turf
- Sales
difficulties (the customer is not always right)
- Employee
control
- Community
disorganization
- Inciardi:
overly-determined behavior
Go to National
Institute of Justice publication page for additional resources.
Marijuana
and Crime
- Early
images (1930s): Killer Weed that produced wild and violent behavior
- 1970:
National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse
- Overwhelming current
evidence: No violence/aggression
- But,
marijuana use is correlatied with criminal offenses with heavier users displaying
more crimnal involvement than light users.
- Issues
to consider:
- Other
drug use--heavier
users are more likely to use other drugs
- Those
who use only marijuana report crimnal involvement closer to non-users.
- Significance
of friends, subcultural involvement--it's the social circles rahther
than the drug that explains rates of criminality
Bruce Johnson (1973):
Uncovered these same correlations, but makes the crucial point that:
- Irregular users who
are involved in subcultural activities like distributing the drug are more
likely than regular users who do not participate in the subculture, to engage
in criminal and aggressive behavior.
Indication: Relationship
is spurious, but nonetheless, marijuana is used by many offenders.
- Most
likely to be involved of all drugs
- Most
offenders, UTI: Commonly used
- Psychopharmacological?
- Studies
difficult and flawed (etoh cause, how drunk, etc.)
- Males
use more, and offend more
- Consumed
during periods crime is more likely (weekends)
- UTI==>
excuse: Drunken comportment- Cultural norm
- Still:
Violence and Alcohol==> "Peas in a Pod"
Violent Death and Alcohol
- Wolfgang (1958) 60%
of killers (lots of confirmation)
- Inciardi, et al, 1997:
Legalizing Drugs: Would it Really Reduce Violent Crime? (AD reader)
- 1990 International
Study: 62% of violent offenders report heavy use, and UI.
- Males who fight
and carry weapons: 20 times more likely to drink regularly.
- 1994: 268 Homocides
- 31% drunk
at the time
- 64% of women
who kill--misuse alcohol
- Victims, too. 25-66%
- Murder interaction:
- Victim
precipitation
- Victim
selection
- Reciprocity:
Male on male
- Highly correlated
with all forms of violent/accidental death (DWI)
- "Alcohol,
Drugs, and Violence," Robert Nash Parker and Kathleen Auerhahn (1998)
- Fagan's
"Intoxication, Aggression, and the Functionality of Violence."
(1990, 1993) "Youth violence is a 'functional, purporsive behavior
that serves definable goals within specific social contexts.'...Another
factor that may influence the meanings attributed to the actions of others
is the consumption of drugs or alcohol, due to the behavioral expectancies
that may be associated with them."
- Parker:
Selective Social Disinhibition approach (1993, 1995)--"Alcohol selectively
disinhibits violence depending on contextual factors specific to the situation,
the actors involved and their relationships to one another, and the impact
of bystanders. In US society, the norms about the appropriateness
of violence in solving interpersonal disputes argue both for and against
such behaviors." (depends on situation, socialization, institutional
support) "In potentially violent situations, it takes
active constraint--a proactive and conscious decision..." Alcohol
use in the right (i.e. wrong) situation can lead to violence as the resolution
option since it can selectively disinhibit "an already weak normative
apparatus. Especially relevant: domestic disputes, closest
interpersonal relationships. They even note: "...the deterrent
effect of capital punishment on homicide rates was strongest in states
that had below average rates of alcohol consumption."
- Alaniz
and Parker: Alcohol Availability, Advertising (local copy) and Violence (1998, 1999).
"The spatial distribution of alcohol outlets and the targeted advertising
of alcohol to particular communities...may mediate (the relationship between
alcohol and violence)."
- ALCOHOL==> Precursor
to violent death
Alcohol and Assault
- Same Pattern
as with murder
- Assault-Homicide:
Do both parties survive?
- Over 60% of
known interactions
- Juveniles use
marijuana as frequently, yet it is half as likely to be present
- Juvies: ETOH==>
2nd most likely to==> fight (Seconal- #1)
- Sexual assault:
40% convicted, 2/3 molesters, 40-65% overall
Causal
Link?
- ETOH one
of a number of factors
- High correlation
- Dis-inhibition
(see, Faupel, Horowitzand Weaver, The Sociology of American Drug Use,
2005, page 311)
- No
scientific support
- No
understanding of why some become violent and others don't
- Social
learning issues--expectations?
- Normative
controls relaxed for those UTI
- Disavowel
of responsibiltiy
- Question
of what exactly is dis-inhibited?
- humans
as "naturally anti-social?
- Social context:
causal in USA (Drunken Comportment--cognitive-guidedness)
- There
appears to be an "interactive relationship" between the pharmacological
properties of alcohol and the cultural guidelines for "behavior under
the influence." There are some things that are simply far less likely
to occur without alcohol being consumed.
- However,
most violence cannot ascribed to etoh: institutional, ideological
- All things
equal: Direct effect on portion of U.S. violence
- Pre-
1970: Image=> NO. Heroin use was associated with Rational
crimes (economic compulsive). Violence was accidental.
- After
1970: ? Violence and street
life. Homicide leading cause of death for user.
- Psychopharmacological
or Subcultural Shift?
- Impact
of withdrawal
- Robbery
and $==> common. Victim confrontation
- Post
1970: Addict involved in crime prior to drug subculture
- Post
1970: Poly drug use: Alcohol and cocaine
- Now:
Use of heroin==> strong link to violent behavior (convicted felons-
high rates of use)
- Yet,
use stable ( even down for a time); cocaine ?
Inciardi: Heroin users
- Challenges
simplistic economic-compulsive model
- Users
engage in a variety of crime, vastly more likely than non-users
- 200
crime days/year (5-10x more than non-users)
- Use
more, more variety, more serious
- Low
arrest probability
- Males:
Alcohol==> Crime==> Drugs
- Females==>
complex variations
- Simple
cause-effect: futile
- Similar
to Nurco, Kinlock, and Hanlon
Heroin and Crime: Summary
- Use
drives crime
- Most
involved prior to use
- Illegality
seems to make things worse
- "Curing"
addiction will not solve problem
- Pharmacological
properties: seems more likely (yet BIJ study)
- Drug
of choice for Robbers
- Crimes
with violence as primary motive (vs. Robbery)
- LA-
Homicide victims (late 80's- 20%), now: most frequently detected drug.
- Question:
predispose to violence or expose to violence
- NY
(1988): 1/3 of all homicides involved cocaine. 60% of drug
related homicides=> Crack. Powdered cocaine: 12% of all, 22% of drug
related.
- 84%
of all drug related violent deaths--Cocaine (heroin only 3 of total).
- Goldstein
and "big" and "small" users (psychopharmacological)
- For
males, as use increases, perpetrating violent crime increase
- For
females, victimization increases with use
- Addition
of alcohol as explanatory factor
- Inciardi:
Cocaine Psychosis, irritability during "withdrawal."
- "Mode
of living," "subculture of violence." "Heavy cocaine use
tends to take place in social settings in which violence is a common accompaniment
among social circles who readily and almost routinely engage in violent behavior"
(Goode, page 328)
Back to Goldstein and
Systemic Violence
- Seller
vs. Casual user (unless sale dispute)
- Crack
Trade:
- Disputational:
violence as leverage
- Anarchistic
- Seller:
violent, criminal background
- Drug
trade violent in and of itself
- "Destabilized"
neighborhoods
- Powerlessness
at community level
- Decline
in use==> Increase in violence!
Hamid: "Crack violence
is the violence of persons reacting violently to conditions that violate"
- Major
correlation
- Psychopharmacological
or Criminal picks up lifestyle of use?
- Cocaine
and reinforcement: Use; like to use again.
- Frequency
of use: lots of transactions and $$$$$. USE IS NOT CHEAPER: Unit dosing.
- Poly
drug use high
- Similar
to heavy heroin users
- 80-90%
arrestees for robbery
- Drug
of choice for "Urban Criminals"
- DUF:
41% males; 47% females
- BUT:
Causality?
- All
levels of criminality go up after cocaine use, NO form of crime BEGINS
after
- Users
already criminal
- Crack,
cocaine: intensifies, accelerates criminality
- Social
context
- Social
circles of users, criminals overlap
- Crime,
Crack, and other drugs: Markers of entrance into deviant, criminal subculture
- Individuals
already characterized by "Non-traditional Lifestyle" (employment
problems, school dropout, marital problems, etc. (Problem-prone behavior)
- Crime
intensified through subcultural development. It's the: Thrill
- Take
away Crack? Depends on what replaces it.
- No drug==>
Crime will drop
- Heroin==>
no change
- Alcohol==>
Violence up, predatory down
Trends
in Crime 1990s-2000s
- Summary
(Goode, 7e, 2008,
page 347)
- Cocaine
and Crack use down (frequent use still high)
- Heroin stable
to increasing; potency and availability up
- Crime: Interesting
decrease in levels of criminal activity (index crimes, especially violent)
- Cigarettes
and Crime
- Maintenance
of a permanent class of criminals???
- In
general, drug use and criminal behavior seem to vary independently of each
other, and are the products of a set of inter-related variables: overly-determined
behavior.
- Rather
than trying to explain relationship between drug use and crime, perhaps:
- Initiation
into drug use and criminal behavior
- escalation
of drug use and crime
- Maintenance
of a permanent class of addict-criminals
- Drug
use today appears even more significantly correlated with crime: Regular,
frequent, heavy users
Illicit
Drug Industry
URL: http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/180/drgcrime.html
Owner: Robert O. Keel rok@umsl.edu
References and
Credits for this Page of Notes
Last Updated:
Thursday, April 12, 2018 11:55 AM