Examples of Ballot Features That May Reduce Unrecorded Votes
David C. Kimball (UM-St. Louis)
and Martha Kropf (UM-Kansas City)
· Good examples:
· Bad examples (instructions spread across top of the ballot):
· Good examples:
Sullivan County, MO (5th grade level)
Bay County, FL (4th grade level)
Scott County, IA (6th grade level)
· Bad examples:
Grant County, KS (12th grade level)
Wayne County, MO (12th grade level – some instructions are lifted verbatim from the state election code)
· Good examples (ballot contains both elements):
· Partially good examples (ballot contains one element):
· Bad examples (instructions make no mention of spoiled ballots):
· Good example:
Escambia County, FL (governor’s contest)
Pickett County, TN (governor’s contest)
Douglas County, IL (governor’s contest)
Dubuque County, IA (governor’s contest)
Barber County, KS (all contests)
· Bad example:
Polk County, IA (note especially the Secretary of State contest)
Bay County, FL (governor’s contest)
Hamilton County, IL (U.S. Senate and governor contests)
Gove County, KS (U.S. Senate contest)
Coffey County, KS (Governor and U.S. Representative contests)
· Good example:
· Bad example:
· Good example:
· Bad example:
· Good example:
· Bad example:
Barton County, KS (hometown listed next to candidate names)
Emmet County, IA (little space between names in governor’s race, running mate’s name not indented enough)
· Good example:
Bay County, FL (ballot index score of +4)
· Bad example:
Grant County, KS (ballot index score of –2)